Skip to content
← back to portfolio [simplepractice · reason for visit]
> cat ./projects/simplepractice-reason-for-visit.md · CASE STUDY · 2022 · PRODUCT · GROWTH
[01] PROJECT · trial-to-activation · simplepractice

Reason for Visit: unlocking growth through trial-to-activation.

Led a high-stakes product initiative that increased trial-to-activation by 19% while navigating clinician trust crisis and regulatory concerns.

[02]

The context

// ACTIVATION GAP

Trial users at SimplePractice—especially new or solo clinicians—struggled to reach the “Aha! moment”: creating their first client appointment. Internal analytics revealed that fewer than 42% of trialers scheduled a session in their first 7 days, a major barrier to activation and conversion.

Our hypothesis: clinicians weren’t ready to create appointments because they were missing key intake context—specifically, understanding why a client was reaching out.

// TRIAL USER FUNNEL · BEFORE
// 0–100% scale · 7-day cohort
Trial start
100%
Setup
78%
First appt
42%
▼ 58% drop-off at activation · the activation gap
[03]

Research & insights

// N = 734

We launched a user research initiative focused on early-stage private practice clinicians. Our research combined quantitative surveys (N = 734), qualitative interviews (12 in-depth sessions), and funnel analysis from sign-up to first appointment.

// SURVEY · WHAT INFO CLINICIANS NEED BEFORE BOOKING
> “Which pieces of information do you need before you can confidently schedule an appointment with a new client?”
Reason for visit
97%
Insurance info
82%
Availability
78%
Therapy history
61%
Emergency contact
44%
// SOLO THERAPIST · CA “If I don’t know what they’re coming in for, I won’t book them. It’s a liability risk and a therapeutic mismatch.”
[04]

The solution

// REASON FOR VISIT
// 4.1 · INTAKE FIELD

Introduce “Reason for Visit” during client intake

We scoped and released a lightweight “Reason for Visit” field in the initial client intake form.

  • Let clients share their therapy goals or concerns
  • Gave clinicians immediate context before booking
  • Was legally reviewed and included clear disclaimers
  • Included toggles for clinician control
// 4.2 · TECHNICAL APPROACH

Rollout & instrumentation

  • Canary release. Implemented across ~5% of new accounts.
  • Monitoring. Watched for performance, abandonment, and CS tickets.
  • Staged rollout. Rolled out in stages over 4 weeks.
[05]

User concerns

// IMPLEMENTATION FEEDBACK

Following the release, we received increased feedback from users through social media, support tickets, and direct communication highlighting important concerns:

// WHAT WE HEARD
  • Clinicians were uncomfortable with liability exposure (e.g. client mentions suicidal ideation pre-screening)
  • Others were upset this was enabled by default
  • Several called out lack of communication and settings control
// FEEDBACK VOLUME · 14-DAY TIMELINE

Support tickets and community posts per day following feature release. Peak volume hit on day 7 before stabilizing.

// day 1 · feature released
Day 1
8
Day 2
12
// day 3 · investigation started
Day 3
15
Day 4
22
Day 5
31
// day 6 · first fixes deployed
Day 6
38
Day 7
42
Day 8
41
Day 9
35
Day 10
28
Day 11
22
// day 12 · full resolution
Day 12
18
Day 13
15
Day 14
12
▼ volume returned to baseline by day 14 after fixes shipped
[06]

Response & resolution

// HOW WE RESPONDED
// OUR RESPONSE APPROACH
  • Spoke to clinicians 1:1 and on public threads
  • Partnered with legal to clarify disclaimers and update copy
  • Released Vacation Mode so clinicians could pause intake
  • Made “Reason for Visit” fully opt-in, with onboarding prompts
  • Enabled the feature retroactively as a recommended setting for new signups
[07]

Outcomes

// MEASURED
// ADOPTION · % OF CLINICIANS USING FEATURE
Active base
70%+
New (60d)
93%

Impact metrics

Measured outcomes after rollout and resolution.

First appt (7d) +19% // activation lift
Trial → paid +14% // conversion lift
No-shows −11% // session quality
// TRIAL FUNNEL · BEFORE VS AFTER
// 7-day cohort · same scale
// before
Trial start
100%
Setup
78%
First appt
42%
// after
Trial start
100%
Setup
81%
First appt
61%
▲ +19 pp first-appt activation · the gap closed
[08]

Why it mattered

// LESSONS

This project required us to navigate complex tradeoffs while managing unexpected user concerns. After the initial rollout and feedback, we needed to evaluate what to modify, what to maintain, and how to respond thoughtfully. Our focus remained on improving the user experience, taking responsibility for the outcomes, and rebuilding trust through meaningful changes and clear communication.

// VALIDATED NEED

Validated a real user need with data and empathy.

// HANDLED BACKLASH

Handled backlash without blaming users.

// BALANCED TRADEOFFS

Balanced legal, user trust, and product goals.

// SHIPPED & ADAPTED

Shipped, learned, adapted fast.

// LICENSED THERAPIST · TX · POST-RESOLUTION “The Reason for Visit field has been a game-changer. I can now prepare for sessions properly and my clients feel heard from the start. Thank you for listening to our concerns and making it optional.”
// LET’S TALK

Ready to transform your product growth?

I specialize in product-led growth strategies that drive real conversion improvements. Let’s discuss how systematic experimentation and user-focused design can unlock your product’s potential.

made with care & curiosity · saadat · beaverton, or
© Saadat Islam